SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Publishing Embargoes and Versions of Preprints: Impact on the Dissemination of Information
16 references·0 citing·41 second hop
Publishing Embargoes and Versions of Preprints: Impact on the Dissemination of Information (2024)Publishing Embargoes and Versions of Prep…Open access research outputs receive more diverse citations (2024)Open access research outputs …Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research (2022)Should open access lead to cl…Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles (2021)Is the open access citation a…The relationship between bioRxiv preprints, citations and altmetrics (2020)The relationship between bioR…Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences (2020)Problematizing ‘predatory pub…Preprint Servers’ Policies, Submission Requirements, and Transparency in Reporting and Research Integrity Recommendations (2020)Preprint Servers’ Policies, S…Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals (2020)Peer review and preprint poli…Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)Demarcating spectrums of pred…Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)Ten Hot Topics around Scholar…Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment (2019)Predatory and exploitative be…Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature (2018)Sci-Hub provides access to ne…Gold, green, and black open access (2017)Gold, green, and black open a…The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The academic, economic and so…The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The STM Report: An overview o…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…The Diamond Model of Open Access Publishing: Why Policy Makers, Scholars, Universities, Libraries, Labour Unions and the Publishing World Need to Take Non-Commercial, Non-Profit Open Access Serious (2013)The Diamond Model of Open Acc…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (1977)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)Anatomy of green open access (2013)Looking into Pandora's Box: The Content of Sci-Hub and its Usage (2017)Evidence of open access of scientific publications in Google Scholar: A large-scale analysis (2018)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Scholia, Scientometrics and Wikidata (2017)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Low income countries have the highest percentages of open access publication: A systematic computational analysis of the biomedical literature (2019)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic (2020)“Real impact”: Challenges and opportunities in bridging the gap between research and practice – Making a difference in industry, policy, and society (2024)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature (2017)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Redefine statistical significance (2017)Preprints as accelerator of scholarly communication: An empirical analysis in Mathematics (2020)New trends in bibliometric APIs: A comparative analysis (2023)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review (2021)Who Counts? (2023)Is circular economy a failing sustainability paradigm? Not necessarily (2025)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Female entrepreneurship in emerging and developing countries: a systematic review of practical and policy implications and suggestions for new studies (2022)Open access publishing – noble intention, flawed reality (2022)Factors associating with or predicting more cited or higher quality journal articles: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper (2023)Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective (2017)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2015The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing396 cited
  • 2021Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles232 cited
  • 2013The Diamond Model of Open Access Publishing: Why Policy Makers, Scholars, Universities, Libraries, Labour Unions and the Publishing World Need to Take Non-Commercial, Non-Profit Open Access Serious199 cited
  • 2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review182 cited
  • 2018Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature176 cited
  • 2017Gold, green, and black open access136 cited
  • 2020The relationship between bioRxiv preprints, citations and altmetrics134 cited
  • 2019Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing128 cited
  • 2020Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences123 cited
  • 2022Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research120 cited
  • 2020Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy97 cited
  • 2024Open access research outputs receive more diverse citations96 cited
  • 2020

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals
89 cited
  • 2020Preprint Servers’ Policies, Submission Requirements, and Transparency in Reporting and Research Integrity Recommendations78 cited
  • 2019Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment77 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.