The AI Act, gender equality and non-discrimination: what role for the AI office?

Fabian Lütz

26 citations0/0 files storedERA Forum

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Digitalization, Law, and Regulation Discrimination and Equality Law

Abstract

Abstract This article assesses whether the Artificial Intelligence Act sufficiently addresses issues of gender equality and non-discrimination law. To this end, the substantive provisions of the AI Act are analysed through the lens of gender equality and non-discrimination law, highlighting the proposed tools of fundamental rights impact assessments and bias audits to reduce gender biases and discriminatory risk. Furthermore, the role of the AI Office and its cooperation with national, European, and international bodies for gender equality enforcement are discussed and positioned within the global landscape of AI regulation.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraints 2020Human–AI Interactions in Public Sector Decision Making: “Automation Bias” and “Selective Adherence” to Algorithmic Advice 2020Invisible Women Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men 2018Teaching fairness to artificial intelligence: Existing and novel strategies against algorithmic discrimination under EU law 2022Auditing the AI auditors: A framework for evaluating fairness and bias in high stakes AI predictive models.2022How do people react to AI failure? Automation bias, algorithmic aversion, and perceived controllability 2023More than a Glitch 2021Beyond the individual: governing AI’s societal harm

Cited by

2025Fairness in AI systems development: EU AI Act compliance and beyond 2025Transparent and bias-resilient AI framework for recidivism prediction using deep learning and clustering techniques in criminal justice

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.