CopulaREMADA: Copula Mixed Models for Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

Abstract

The bivariate copula mixed model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies in Nikoloulopoulos (2015) <doi:10.1002/sim.6595> and Nikoloulopoulos (2018) <doi:10.1007/s10182-017-0299-y>. The vine copula mixed model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence in Nikoloulopoulos (2017) <doi:10.1177/0962280215596769> and also accounting for non-evaluable subjects in Nikoloulopoulos (2020) <doi:10.1515/ijb-2019-0107>. The hybrid vine copula mixed model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy case-control and cohort studies in Nikoloulopoulos (2018) <doi:10.1177/0962280216682376>. The D-vine copula mixed model for meta-analysis and comparison of two diagnostic tests in Nikoloulopoulos (2019) <doi:10.1177/0962280218796685>. The multinomial quadrivariate D-vine copula mixed model for meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with non-evaluable subjects in Nikoloulopoulos (2020) <doi:10.1177/0962280220913898>. The one-factor copula mixed model for joint meta-analysis of multiple diagnostic tests in Nikoloulopoulos (2022) <doi:10.1111/rssa.12838>. The multinomial six-variate 1-truncated D-vine copula mixed model for meta-analysis of two diagnostic tests accounting for within and between studies dependence in Nikoloulopoulos (2024) <doi:10.1177/09622802241269645>. The 1-truncated D-vine copula mixed models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard (Nikoloulopoulos, 2025) <doi:10.1093/biomtc/ujaf037>.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.