SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Path of excellence: A co-authorship network analysis of European Research Council grant winners in social sciences
16 references·0 citing·55 second hopsampled
Path of excellence: A co-authorship network analysis of European Research Council grant winners in social sciences (2024)Path of excellence: A co-authorship netwo…How to measure research efficiency in higher education? Research grants vs. publication output (2019)How to measure research effic…Research excellence indicators: time to reimagine the ‘making of’? (2018)Research excellence indicator…The European Research Council (2017)The European Research CouncilResearch collaboration in groups and networks: differences across academic fields (2017)Research collaboration in gro…Measuring impact in research evaluations: a thorough discussion of methods for, effects of and problems with impact measurements (2016)Measuring impact in research …Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young universities (2016)Influence of international co…The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The journal coverage of Web o…The incidence and role of negative citations in science (2015)The incidence and role of neg…Excellence in the knowledge-based economy: from scientific to research excellence (2015)Excellence in the knowledge-b…Does Co‐authorship Lead to Higher Academic Productivity? (2014)Does Co‐authorship Lead to Hi…Competitive Research Grants and Their Impact on Career Performance (2014)Competitive Research Grants a…Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding (2013)Big Science vs. Little Scienc…The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity (2011)The impact of research grant …Capturing Research Impacts: A review of international practice (2010)Capturing Research Impacts: A…Measuring Co-Authorship and Networking-Adjusted Scientific Impact (2008)Measuring Co-Authorship and N…Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes (2008)Does the Committee Peer Revie…Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review (2021)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Endogenous Technological Change (1989)Endogenous Technological Change (1990)The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration (2018)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Exploratory Research (2020)Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship (1984)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches (2009)Scientific peer review (2011)Governing Science (2016)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence‐Based Policy Making (2002)Incentives and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences (2011)Which gender gap? Factors affecting researchers’ scientific impact in science and medicine (2016)“Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence (2017)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations (2001)University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison (2003)The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity (2005)Developing a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: A mixed methods approach (2014)The determinants of research performance in European universities: a large scale multilevel analysis (2017)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Real Effects of Academic Research (1989)Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations (1993)The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation (2015)The Matthew effect in science funding (2018)A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation (2019)Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies (2004)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)International collaboration in scientific research in Vietnam: an analysis of patterns and impact (2016)Global science and national comparisons: beyond bibliometrics and scientometrics (2021)What drives global science? The four competing narratives (2021)What is research collaboration? (1997)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Gender gaps in international research collaboration: a bibliometric approach (2019)Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review (2020)Exploring contributors, collaborations, and research topics in educational technology: A joint analysis of mainstream conferences (2022)Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures (1987)Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations (1991)Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks (2001)Social Networks and Research Output (2013)On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications (2017)The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants (2017)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Rethinking the Commercialization of Public Science: From Entrepreneurial Outcomes to Societal Impacts (2018)Revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement (2018)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis6,284 cited
  • 2011The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity543 cited
  • 2014Does Co‐authorship Lead to Higher Academic Productivity?247 cited
  • 2013Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding189 cited
  • 2015The incidence and role of negative citations in science188 cited
  • 2016Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young universities160 cited
  • 2017Research collaboration in groups and networks: differences across academic fields155 cited
  • 2016Measuring impact in research evaluations: a thorough discussion of methods for, effects of and problems with impact measurements116 cited
  • 2014Competitive Research Grants and Their Impact on Career Performance112 cited
  • 2008Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes112 cited
  • 2018Research excellence indicators: time to reimagine the ‘making of’?96 cited
  • 2019How to measure research efficiency in higher education? Research grants vs. publication output88 cited
  • 2010Capturing Research Impacts: A review of international practice87 cited
  • 2015Excellence in the knowledge-based economy: from scientific to research excellence

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

83 cited
  • 2008Measuring Co-Authorship and Networking-Adjusted Scientific Impact82 cited
  • 2017The European Research Council68 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.