SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Informing pandemic management in Germany with trustworthy living evidence syntheses and guideline development: lessons learned from the COVID-19 evidence ecosystem
10 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Informing pandemic management in Germany with trustworthy living evidence syntheses and guideline development: lessons learned from the COVID-19 evidence ecosystem (2024)Informing pandemic management in Germany …Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study (2023)Public information needs and …Resources supporting trustworthy, rapid and equitable evidence synthesis and guideline development: results from the COVID-19 evidence network to support decision-making (COVID-END) (2022)Resources supporting trustwor…Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation (2022)Describing the state of a res…Evaluation of the comprehensiveness, accuracy and currency of the Cochrane COVID ‐19 Study Register for supporting rapid evidence synthesis production (2021)Evaluation of the comprehensi…Waste in covid-19 research (2020)Waste in covid-19 researchThe COVID-NMA Project: Building an Evidence Ecosystem for the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020)The COVID-NMA Project: Buildi…Future of Evidence Ecosystem Series: Evidence synthesis 2.0: when systematic, scoping, rapid, living, and overviews of reviews come together (2020)Future of Evidence Ecosystem …Future of evidence ecosystem series: 3. From an evidence synthesis ecosystem to an evidence ecosystem (2020)Future of evidence ecosystem …Future of evidence ecosystem series: 2. current opportunities and need for better tools and methods (2020)Future of evidence ecosystem …Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction Evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic change (2020)Future of evidence ecosystem …Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Challenges of evidence synthesis during the 2020 COVID pandemic: a scoping review (2021)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews1 (2023)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting (2018)Open synthesis and the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 (2020)A living critical interpretive synthesis to yield a framework on the production and dissemination of living evidence syntheses for decision-making (2024)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review (2016)Four principles to make evidence synthesis more useful for policy (2018)Day-to-day discovery of preprint–publication links (2021)Methods for developing and reporting living evidence synthesis (2022)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement (2015)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing, and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review (2023)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: A rapid systematic review (2020)Implicit bias in healthcare: clinical practice, research and decision making (2021)Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts (2023)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Assessing the robustness of results from clinical trials and meta-analyses with the fragility index (2022)Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South African Local Communities: The VaxScenes Study (2022)Study-based registers reduce waste in systematic reviewing: discussion and case report (2019)When science goes viral: The research response during three months of the COVID-19 outbreak (2020)An evaluation of Cochrane Crowd found that crowdsourcing produced accurate results in identifying randomized trials (2021)Secondary electronic sources demonstrated very good sensitivity for identifying studies evaluating interventions for COVID-19 (2021)The currency and completeness of specialized databases of COVID-19 publications (2022)The NICE search filters for treating and managing COVID-19: validation in MEDLINE and Embase (Ovid) (2024)Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations (2022)Living evidence and adaptive policy: perfect partners? (2023)Exploring trial publication and research waste in COVID-19 randomised trials of hydroxychloroquine, corticosteroids, and vitamin D: a meta-epidemiological cohort study (2024)Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2007)Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review (2011)Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review (2013)Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration (2014)Swiss residents’ information behavior perceptions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal qualitative study (2024)Unveiling the Intersection of Age and Gender in the Emotional Well-being of Older Students: A Pilot Study at the Permanent University for Adults in Alicante (Spain) (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020Waste in covid-19 research330 cited
  • 2020The COVID-NMA Project: Building an Evidence Ecosystem for the COVID-19 Pandemic95 cited
  • 2020Future of evidence ecosystem series: 3. From an evidence synthesis ecosystem to an evidence ecosystem70 cited
  • 2020Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction Evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic change66 cited
  • 2020Future of evidence ecosystem series: 2. current opportunities and need for better tools and methods36 cited
  • 2022Resources supporting trustworthy, rapid and equitable evidence synthesis and guideline development: results from the COVID-19 evidence network to support decision-making (COVID-END)33 cited
  • 2020Future of Evidence Ecosystem Series: Evidence synthesis 2.0: when systematic, scoping, rapid, living, and overviews of reviews come together30 cited
  • 2021Evaluation of the comprehensiveness, accuracy and currency of the Cochrane COVID ‐19 Study Register for supporting rapid evidence synthesis production25 cited
  • 2023Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study12 cited
  • 2022Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation8 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work