Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Evaluation of adherence to STARD for abstracts in a diverse sample of diagnostic accuracy abstracts published in 2012 and 2019 reveals suboptimal reporting practices

16 references·1 citing·44 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2007Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts996 cited
2015STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies992 cited
2003Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.862 cited
2008CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts460 cited
2014Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial366 cited
2009Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: a meta-analysis of empirical studies189 cited
2013Overinterpretation and Misreporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Evidence of “Spin”164 cited
2014Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Some Improvements after 10 Years of STARD113 cited
2017STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts77 cited
2017Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 201559 cited
2014Publication and Reporting of Test Accuracy Studies Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov47 cited
2017Facilitating Prospective Registration of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A STARD Initiative36 cited
2020Adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 Guidelines in Acute Point-of-Care Ultrasound Research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

35 cited

2015Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies29 cited

2014Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports27 cited

2020Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evaluation of “Spin” in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in High–Impact Factor Journals23 cited

Cited by

2025Evaluation of Imaging Research Adherence to the STARD 2015 Reporting Guideline: Update 9 Years After Implementation and Baseline Assessment5 cited