SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The H-index is an unreliable research metric for evaluating the publication impact of experimental scientists
8 references·1 citing·35 second hop
The H-index is an unreliable research metric for evaluating the publication impact of experimental scientists (2024)The H-index is an unreliable research met…Tackling overpublishing by moving to open-ended papers (2023)Tackling overpublishing by mo…How bibliometrics and school rankings reward unreliable science (2023)How bibliometrics and school …Four problems of the h-index for assessing the research productivity and impact of individual authors (2022)Four problems of the h-index …The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation (2021)The h-index is no longer an e…Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia (2019)Games academics play and thei…Overcitation and overrepresentation of review papers in the most cited papers (2018)Overcitation and overrepresen…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Citation structural diversity: a novel metric combining structure and semantics for literature evaluation (2025)Citation structural diversity…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Comparison of the share of documents and citations from different quartile journals in 25 research areas (2019)Gendered citation practices in the field of communication (2021)CAse-BAsed REview sTandards (CABARET): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors (2024)The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I (1964)Can I afford to publish? A dilemma for African scholars (2021)Primate conservation: Lessons learned in the last 20 years can guide future efforts (2021)Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences (2022)A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION (1938)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Research Hotspots and Trends of Peripheral Nerve Injuries Based on Web of Science From 2017 to 2021: A Bibliometric Analysis (2022)The link between countries’ economic and scientific wealth has a complex dependence on technological activity and research policy (2022)The h-Index: Understanding its predictors, significance, and criticism (2023)Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications (2007)h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009)Bibliometric Studies as a Publication Strategy (2024)How co-authorship affects the H-index? (2024)From Integrity to Inflation: Ethical and Unethical Citation Practices in Academic Publishing (2025)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review (2021)Empowering Early Career Polar Researchers in a changing climate: Challenges and solutions (2024)China's Publication Bazaar (2013)Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Why are some articles highly cited in applied linguistics? A bibliometric study (2025)Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers (1963)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)The Strength of Weak Ties (1973)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2021The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation201 cited
  • 2018Overcitation and overrepresentation of review papers in the most cited papers148 cited
  • 2019Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia133 cited
  • 2022Four problems of the h-index for assessing the research productivity and impact of individual authors45 cited
  • 2023Tackling overpublishing by moving to open-ended papers16 cited
  • 2023How bibliometrics and school rankings reward unreliable science14 cited

Cited by

  • 2025Citation structural diversity: a novel metric combining structure and semantics for literature evaluation9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work