SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence in systematic searching: A comparative case study of a human librarian, ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-4 Turbo
12 references·0 citing·52 second hop
Exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence in systematic searching: A comparative case study of a human librarian, ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-4 Turbo (2024)Exploring the use of generative artificia…Development of search strategies for systematic reviews in health using ChatGPT: a critical analysis (2024)Development of search strateg…Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions (2023)Harnessing the Power of ChatG…ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)ChatGPT: A comprehensive revi…Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search? (2023)Can ChatGPT Write a Good Bool…Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? (2023)Are ChatGPT and large languag…A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies? (2019)A question of trust: can we b…Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review (2018)Roles for librarians in syste…Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2018)Making progress with the auto…A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018)A systematic approach to sear…How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously? (2015)How to conduct systematic rev…Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare (2013)Systematic reviews and meta-a…The librarian's roles in the systematic review process: a case study. (2005)The librarian's roles in the …Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)How to Conduct a Systematic Review: A Narrative Literature Review (2016)Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Practices in Secondary Education (2018)Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation (2020)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions (2002)Systematic Reviews and Librarians (2006)Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews (2016)It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks (2018)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services (2019)Characteristics of systematic reviews in the social sciences (2021)Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews (2024)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)A topography of climate change research (2020)Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020)Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review (2021)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0 (2024)Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology (1989)Diffusion of innovations (2003)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)An evaluation of DistillerSR’s machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening – impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes (2020)Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance (2020)Scoping Reviews, Systematic Reviews, and Meta-Analysis: Applications in Veterinary Medicine (2020)HISTORIAE, History of Socio-Cultural Transformation as Linguistic Data Science. A Humanities Use Case (2019)Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics (2023)Are both generative AI and ChatGPT game changers for 21st-Century operations and supply chain excellence? (2023)How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity? (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT (2024)Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use—a scoping review (2025)The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review (2025)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017)Evaluating the effectiveness of large language models in abstract screening: a comparative analysis (2024)The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review (2018)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)Improving the translation of search strategies using the Polyglot Search Translator: a randomized controlled trial (2020)AI for social science and social science of AI: A survey (2024)How to search for literature in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comprehensive step-by-step guide (2024)Title and abstract screening for literature reviews using large language models: an exploratory study in the biomedical domain (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope2,455 cited
  • 2018A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches861 cited
  • 2013Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare742 cited
  • 2023Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation?206 cited
  • 2023Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search?205 cited
  • 2023Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions201 cited
  • 2018Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)191 cited
  • 2019A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies?167 cited
  • 2018Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review156 cited
  • 2005The librarian's roles in the systematic review process: a case study.111 cited
  • 2015How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?104 cited
  • 2024Development of search strategies for systematic reviews in health using ChatGPT: a critical analysis28 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work