SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparing different scoping and mapping review methodologies: A practical example using the nursing mobile workstation
16 references·0 citing·31 second hopsampled
Comparing different scoping and mapping review methodologies: A practical example using the nursing mobile workstation (2024)Comparing different scoping and mapping r…Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family (2023)Mapping reviews, scoping revi…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidan…Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Meeting the review family: ex…Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks (2019)Definition of a systematic re…PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Summarizing systematic reviewsScoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting (2014)Scoping reviews: time for cla…A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework (2013)Enhancing the scoping study m…What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature (2009)What are scoping studies? A r…Citation Statistics (2009)Citation StatisticsA typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems (1997)Bibliometric Indicators and A…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data (2000)Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research (2002)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (1986)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Social media use and its impact on adolescent mental health: An umbrella review of the evidence (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation45,728 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework37,853 cited
  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews27,008 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies11,662 cited
  • 2020Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews8,316 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,124 cited
  • 2014Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting2,802 cited
  • 2015Summarizing systematic reviews2,731 cited
  • 2013Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework1,904 cited
  • 2009What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature863 cited
  • 2019Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements599 cited
  • 1997Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems406 cited
  • 2023Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

379 cited
  • 2009Citation Statistics293 cited
  • 2019Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks259 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.