SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Nine quick tips for open meta-analyses
16 references·0 citing·26 second hop
Nine quick tips for open meta-analyses (2024)Nine quick tips for open meta-analysesThe PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The Role of Google Scholar in…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Increasing value and reducing…Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R…A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)A basic introduction to fixed…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisCochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package20,412 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis14,215 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 2010A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis6,786 cited
  • 2021PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews3,654 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2,686 cited
  • 2015The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching2,381 cited
  • 2014Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis1,597 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.