SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between motor milestone timing and motor development in neurodevelopmental conditions
15 references·0 citing·40 second hop
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between motor milestone timing and motor development in neurodevelopmental conditions (2024)A systematic review and meta-analysis of …Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis (2020)Estimating the sample mean an…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity (2017)Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 …Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2014)Diagnostic and Statistical Ma…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Motor Impairments in Children Associated With Impairments of Speech or Language: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research Literature (2009)Motor Impairments in Children…Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)Tools for assessing quality a…Bayley Scales of Infant Development (2007)Bayley Scales of Infant Devel…WHO Motor Development Study: Windows of achievement for six gross motor development milestones (2006)WHO Motor Development Study: …Non‐specific nature of specific language impairment: a review of the literature with regard to concomitant motor impairments (2001)Non‐specific nature of specif…Non-specific nature of specific language impairment: a review of the literature with regard to concomitant motor impairments (2001)Non-specific nature of specif…Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funne…The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)The feasibility of creating a…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…A controlled study of Tourette syndrome. VI. Early development, sleep problems, allergies, and handedness. (1987)A controlled study of Tourett…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions (2011)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Introduction, comparison, and validation of Meta‐Essentials : A free and simple tool for meta‐analysis (2017)Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. (2017)Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from order statistics and sample size in meta-analysis (2021)The relationship between 2019-nCoV and psychological distress among parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (2021)metamedian : An R package for meta‐analyzing studies reporting medians (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Mullen Scales of Early Learning (1997)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research (2021)The development of motor behavior (2016)Power in methods: language to infants in structured and naturalistic contexts (2017)Motor Development: Embodied, Embedded, Enculturated, and Enabling (2018)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2000Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis14,088 cited
  • 1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.8,247 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
  • 2007Bayley Scales of Infant Development4,237 cited
  • 2017Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity1,841 cited
  • 2007Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography1,532 cited
  • 2020Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis865 cited
  • 2006WHO Motor Development Study: Windows of achievement for six gross motor development milestones675 cited
  • 2014Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders562 cited
  • 2001Non‐specific nature of specific language impairment: a review of the literature with regard to concomitant motor impairments535 cited
  • 1987A controlled study of Tourette syndrome. VI. Early development, sleep problems, allergies, and handedness.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

69 cited
  • 2009Motor Impairments in Children Associated With Impairments of Speech or Language: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research Literature55 cited
  • 2001Non-specific nature of specific language impairment: a review of the literature with regard to concomitant motor impairments52 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.