References

• 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
• 2013Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought678 cited
• 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review453 cited
• 2020The limitations to our understanding of peer review383 cited
• 2021A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review305 cited
• 2017Predatory journals recruit fake editor238 cited
• 2017Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research217 cited
• 2002The peer‐review process206 cited
• 2018The state of the art in peer review171 cited
• 2015Peer-Review Fraud — Hacking the Scientific Publication Process163 cited
• 2015Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth?151 cited
• 2007The Relationship of Previous Training and Experience of Journal Peer Reviewers to Subsequent Review Quality139 cited
• 2008Peer review in scholarly journals: Perspective of the scholarly community – Results from an international study102 cited
• 2010Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors73 cited
• 2021Managing individual research productivity in academic organizations: A review of the evidence and a path forward