General-purpose AI regulation and the European Union AI Act

Oskar Josef Gstrein · Noman Haleem · Andrej Zwitter

66 citations0/0 files storedInternet Policy Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Digitalization, Law, and Regulation Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Law, AI, and Intellectual Property

Abstract

This article provides an initial analysis of the EU AI Act's approach to general-purpose artificial intelligence, arguing that the regulation marks a significant shift from reactive to proactive AI governance, while concerns about its enforceability, democratic legitimacy and future-proofing remain.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 66 citations exist upstream.

References

2015The Black Box Society 2019The Brussels Effect 2021Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach 2023Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models 2022Governing artificial intelligence in China and the European Union: Comparing aims and promoting ethical outcomes 2022Artificial Intelligence Crime: An Overview of Malicious Use and Abuse of AI 2021How the EU Can Achieve Legally Trustworthy AI: A Response to the European Commission’s Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act 2023ChatGPT and the AI Act

Cited by

2025Artificial intelligence in governance: recent trends, risks, challenges, innovative frameworks and future directions 2025Limitations of risk-based artificial intelligence regulation: a structuration theory approach 2024Navigating data governance risks: Facial recognition in law enforcement under EU legislation 2024Artificial intelligence and the future(s) of archival theory and practice 2025Beyond algorithm aversion: How users trade off decisional agency and optimal outcomes when choosing between algorithms and human decision-makers

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.