SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Automation of duplicate record detection for systematic reviews: Deduplicator
8 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Automation of duplicate record detection for systematic reviews: Deduplicator (2024)Automation of duplicate record detection …Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references (2021)Considerations for conducting…The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials (2019)The significant cost of syste…Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2018)Making progress with the auto…Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Analysis of the time and work…New evidence pyramid (2016)New evidence pyramidDe-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote (2016)De-duplication of database se…Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module (2015)Better duplicate detection fo…Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Systematic review automation …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Adolescent Sport Participation and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020)Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study (2023)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence (2011)MetaInsight: An interactive web‐based tool for analyzing, interrogating, and visualizing network meta‐analyses using R‐shiny and netmeta (2019)Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction (2019)The Handbook of Behavior Change (2020)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making (2018)Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A topography of climate change research (2020)Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review (2021)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Web-Based Software Tools for Systematic Literature Review in Medicine: Systematic Search and Feature Analysis (2022)Potential Roles of Large Language Models in the Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2024)Development of Prompt Templates for Large Language Model–Driven Screening in Systematic Reviews (2025)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Reducing systematic review burden using Deduklick: a novel, automated, reliable, and explainable deduplication algorithm to foster medical research (2022)Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews (2023)Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence (2017)Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies (2018)Loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis. (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote1,926 cited
  • 2016New evidence pyramid1,382 cited
  • 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
  • 2014Systematic review automation technologies471 cited
  • 2021Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references251 cited
  • 2015Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module206 cited
  • 2018Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)191 cited
  • 2019The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials151 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work