SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Competing for research funding: Key elements impacting the evaluation of grant proposal
16 references·0 citing·56 second hop
Competing for research funding: Key elements impacting the evaluation of grant proposal (2024)Competing for research funding: Key eleme…The effect of writing style on success in grant applications (2022)The effect of writing style o…Conditions that do or do not disadvantage interdisciplinary research proposals in project evaluation (2022)Conditions that do or do not …Interdisciplinary researchers attain better long-term funding performance (2021)Interdisciplinary researchers…Criteria for assessing grant applications: a systematic review (2020)Criteria for assessing grant …Competition and gender: Time’s up on essentialist knowledge production (2020)Competition and gender: Time’…Interdisciplinarity revisited: evidence for research impact and dynamism (2019)Interdisciplinarity revisited…Who benefits from ex ante societal impact evaluation in the European funding arena? A cross-country comparison of societal impact capacity in the social sciences and humanities (2018)Who benefits from ex ante soc…The important thing is not to win, it is to take part: What if scientists benefit from participating in research grant competitions? (2018)The important thing is not to…What constitutes appropriate peer review for interdisciplinary research? (2016)What constitutes appropriate …Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)Looking Across and Looking Be…Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success (2016)Interdisciplinary research ha…How Does National Scientific Funding Support Emerging Interdisciplinary Research: A Comparison Study of Big Data Research in the US and China (2016)How Does National Scientific …Evaluating interdisciplinary research: the elephant in the peer-reviewers’ room (2016)Evaluating interdisciplinary …Academic tenure, risk-taking and the diversification of scientific research (2016)Academic tenure, risk-taking …Evaluation of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research (2008)Evaluation of Interdisciplina…What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences? (2004)What is Originality in the Hu…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Epistemic Cultures (1999)Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge (1999)A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements (2005)Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds (2007)Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies (2015)The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences (1992)Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research (2007)The Science of Team Science (2008)Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature (2010)Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity (2011)Big data: the management revolution. (2012)Big Data : The Management Revolution (2013)A technology delivery system for characterizing the supply side of technology emergence: Illustrated for Big Data & Analytics (2017)Do funded papers attract more usage? (2018)Interdisciplinarity and collaboration: on the relationship between disciplinary diversity in departmental affiliations and reference lists (2018)A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society (2007)Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators (2009)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)Science of science (2018)Machine behaviour (2019)Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention (1962)Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures (1991)The New Statistics (2013)Engineering serendipity: When does knowledge sharing lead to knowledge production? (2020)The funding-productivity-gender nexus in science, a multistage analysis (2020)Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science (2022)The Honest Broker (2007)Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations (2012)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Understanding collaborative interactions in relation to research impact in social sciences and humanities: A meta-ethnography (2020)Fostering Research with Societal Impact in Higher Education Institutions: A Review and Conceptualization (2022)Reconceptualising knowledge exchange and higher education institutions: broadening our understanding of motivations, channels, and stakeholders (2023)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The role of metrics in peer assessments (2020)Peer review in an Era of Evaluation (2022)Towards theorizing peer review (2022)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. (1995)Evaluation of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets: the international collaboration trilemma in interdisciplinary research (2021)Challenges facing interdisciplinary researchers: Findings from a professional development workshop (2022)Circular economy: A new research field? (2023)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Endogenous Technological Change (1990)Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning (1991)Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators (2017)Social Media and Their Affordances for Organizing: A Review and Agenda for Research (2017)Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study (2000)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science (2008)Delayed citation impact of interdisciplinary research (2023)Interdisciplinary research and technological impact: evidence from biomedicine (2023)Interdisciplinary Approaches in Doctoral and Higher Research Education: An Integrative Scoping Review (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Evaluation of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research692 cited
  • 2016Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success598 cited
  • 2016Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science483 cited
  • 2004What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences?333 cited
  • 2019Interdisciplinarity revisited: evidence for research impact and dynamism171 cited
  • 2018The important thing is not to win, it is to take part: What if scientists benefit from participating in research grant competitions?80 cited
  • 2021Interdisciplinary researchers attain better long-term funding performance76 cited
  • 2016How Does National Scientific Funding Support Emerging Interdisciplinary Research: A Comparison Study of Big Data Research in the US and China63 cited
  • 2020Criteria for assessing grant applications: a systematic review59 cited
  • 2018Who benefits from ex ante societal impact evaluation in the European funding arena? A cross-country comparison of societal impact capacity in the social sciences and humanities45 cited
  • 2016Evaluating interdisciplinary research: the elephant in the peer-reviewers’ room35 cited
  • 2020Competition and gender: Time’s up on essentialist knowledge production28 cited
  • 2016Academic tenure, risk-taking and the diversification of scientific research27 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2016What constitutes appropriate peer review for interdisciplinary research?26 cited
  • 2022The effect of writing style on success in grant applications25 cited
  • 2022Conditions that do or do not disadvantage interdisciplinary research proposals in project evaluation24 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.