SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Individual Participant Data Integrity Tool for assessing the integrity of randomised trials
16 references·0 citing·42 second hop
The Individual Participant Data Integrity Tool for assessing the integrity of randomised trials (2024)The Individual Participant Data Integrity…Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)Reducing bias, increasing tra…Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot (2023)Checklist to assess Trustwort…Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis (2022)Identifying and managing prob…Experts identified warning signs of fraudulent research: a qualitative study to inform a screening tool (2022)Experts identified warning si…The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable (2021)The lesson of ivermectin: met…Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review (2021)Methods to assess research mi…Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future (2020)Retracted articles in the obs…False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia (2020)False individual patient data…Check for publication integrity before misconduct (2020)Check for publication integri…Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research (2019)Fraud and Misconduct in Biome…Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials (2016)Systematic review and statist…Health Measurement Scales (2014)Health Measurement ScalesGuidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2004)Clinical trial registration: …Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data (1995)Practical methodology of meta…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression (2009)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3 (2013)Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. (2019)Data Extraction Errors in Meta-analyses That Use Standardized Mean Differences (2007)The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity (2012)Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women’ health (2020)Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem (2021)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Hundreds of thousands of zombie randomised trials circulate among us (2020)Medicine is plagued by untrustworthy clinical trials. How many studies are faked or flawed? (2023)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Discrepancy review: a feasibility study of a novel peer review intervention to reduce undisclosed discrepancies between registrations and publications (2022)Best Laid Plans: A Guide to Reporting Preregistration Deviations (2024)When and How to Deviate From a Preregistration (2024)CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Protocol for the development of a tool (INSPECT-SR) to identify problematic randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of health interventions (2024)Research Integrity in Guidelines and evIDence synthesis (RIGID): a framework for assessing research integrity in guideline development and evidence synthesis (2024)Investigating the impact of trial retractions on the healthcare evidence ecosystem (VITALITY Study I): retrospective cohort study (2025)Ítems de referencia para publicar Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: La Declaración PRISMA (2014)Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013 (2015)Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria (2002)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)The GRoLTS-Checklist: Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Health Measurement Scales2,560 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 1995Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data492 cited
  • 2004Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.275 cited
  • 2023Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration180 cited
  • 2020False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia172 cited
  • 2023Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot147 cited
  • 2020Check for publication integrity before misconduct113 cited
  • 2016Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials108 cited
  • 2022Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis90 cited
  • 2021The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable88 cited
  • 2021Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review68 cited
  • 2020

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future
54 cited
  • 2019Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research52 cited
  • 2022Experts identified warning signs of fraudulent research: a qualitative study to inform a screening tool45 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.