SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for cohort studies
12 references·0 citing·30 second hop
The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for cohort studies (2024)The revised JBI critical appraisal tool f…The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for quasi-experimental studies (2024)The revised JBI critical appr…The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials (2023)The revised JBI critical appr…Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process (2022)Revising the JBI quantitative…PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and e…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk (2019)Chapter 7: Systematic reviews…What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)What kind of systematic revie…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…JBI's Systematic Reviews (2014)JBI's Systematic ReviewsThe PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The development of software to support multiple systematic review types (2018)The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Global trends in the prevalence and incidence of depression:a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being (2021)A systematic review of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in COVID-19 (2021)The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for analytical cross-sectional studies (2025)Umbrella reviews: a methodological guide (2025)A scoping review of policies related to reducing energy drink consumption in children (2024)The effectiveness of cash and cash plus interventions on livelihoods outcomes: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 2021PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews11,660 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration10,345 cited
  • 2019Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk2,110 cited
  • 2023The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials1,213 cited
  • 2018What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences1,160 cited
  • 2024The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for quasi-experimental studies834 cited
  • 2014JBI's Systematic Reviews641 cited
  • 2022Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process466 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work