References

• 2010The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index964 cited
• 2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals868 cited
• 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
• 2021Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases504 cited
• 2002The history of the peer-review process445 cited
• 2010Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence401 cited
• 2014Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.399 cited
• 2014Publish or perish: Where are we heading?386 cited
• 2002Effects of Editorial Peer Review347 cited
• 2021A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review305 cited
• 2017Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective303 cited
• 1998Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review281 cited
• 2018Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days241 cited
• 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review232 cited
• 2002Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review