SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0
6 references·4 citing·41 second hop
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0 (2024)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews o…COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study (2020)COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to a…COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study (2018)COSMIN methodology for evalua…COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (2018)COSMIN guideline for systemat…A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018)A systematic approach to sear…The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1…Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…Explanation & Elaboration document of the COSMIN Reporting Guideline 2.0 for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2025)Explanation & Elaboration doc…Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Perceived Ageism Questionnaire (PAQ-TR) (2025)Cross-Cultural Adaptation and…COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient‑reported outcome measures: version 2.0 (2025)COSMIN reporting guideline fo…Content validity: judging the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of an outcome measurement instrument – a COSMIN perspective (2025)Content validity: judging the…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations (2017)No Surgical Innovation Without Evaluation (2018)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. (1993)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)Systematic review of the measurement properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales–21 by applying updated COSMIN methodology (2019)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Measurement Instruments: A Practical Guideline for Novice Researchers (2024)Item response theory for psychologists (2000)COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (2017)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Appraising systematic reviews: a comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability (2023)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2007)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences (2021)RoBDEMAT: A risk of bias tool and guideline to support reporting of pre-clinical dental materials research and assessment of systematic reviews (2022)Psychological, psychiatric, and behavioral sciences measurement scales: best practice guidelines for their development and validation (2025)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (1989)Qualitative methods for health research (2009)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures (2000)A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures3,333 cited
  • 2018COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study2,328 cited
  • 2017The COMET Handbook: version 1.02,006 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2018A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches861 cited
  • 2020COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study587 cited

Cited by

  • 2025COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient‑reported outcome measures: version 2.0119 cited
  • 2025Content validity: judging the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of an outcome measurement instrument – a COSMIN perspective66 cited
  • 2025Explanation & Elaboration document of the COSMIN Reporting Guideline 2.0 for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures32 cited
  • 2025Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Perceived Ageism Questionnaire (PAQ-TR)2 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work