SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Four Decades of Research Productivity and Hot Spots in Pancreas Transplantation
6 references·0 citing·25 second hop
Four Decades of Research Productivity and Hot Spots in Pancreas Transplantation (2024)Four Decades of Research Productivity and…Application of robotics in abdominal organ transplantation: A bibliometric analysis (2023)Application of robotics in ab…How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)How to conduct a bibliometric…Bibliometrics basics (2015)Bibliometrics basicsCitations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2010)Citations to the “Introductio…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics (2001)The Literature of Bibliometri…Human behavior and the principle of least effort (1949)Theory of the Firm (1966)Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics (1969)A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision (2005)Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis (2017)Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)The Impact Factor Game (2006)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research (2022)Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review (2024)Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps (2024)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Insights and Limitations of Bibliometric Analysis in Solid Organ Transplantation (2024)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2019)Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines18,918 cited
  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,591 cited
  • 2001The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics1,104 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics basics429 cited
  • 2010Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar285 cited
  • 2023Application of robotics in abdominal organ transplantation: A bibliometric analysis8 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work