SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A survey of experts to identify methods to detect problematic studies: stage 1 of the INveStigating ProblEmatic Clinical Trials in Systematic Reviews project
16 references·0 citing·49 second hop
A survey of experts to identify methods to detect problematic studies: stage 1 of the INveStigating ProblEmatic Clinical Trials in Systematic Reviews project (2024)A survey of experts to identify methods t…The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review (2021)Methods to assess research mi…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia (2020)False individual patient data…Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (2020)Digital magic, or the dark ar…Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women’ health (2020)Data integrity of 35 randomis…Check for publication integrity before misconduct (2020)Check for publication integri…Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals (2017)Data fabrication and other re…The GRIM Test (2016)The GRIM TestThe prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) (2015)The prevalence of statistical…Just Post It (2013)Just Post ItThe Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…eTBLAST: a web server to identify expert reviewers, appropriate journals and similar publications (2007)eTBLAST: a web server to iden…The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking (2016)Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature (2017)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Belief in the law of small numbers. (1971)Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? (1998)Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power (2009)Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science (2012)Psychology's Renaissance (2017)Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis (2018)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Scientific Utopia (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity (2012)Reasons for article retraction in anesthesiology: a comprehensive analysis (2019)Social media for rapid knowledge dissemination: early experience from the COVID ‐19 pandemic (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis (2022)Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot (2023)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review (2022)Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review (2023)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2nd edition (2022)Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,820 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews12,012 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,882 cited
  • 2020The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews8,092 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data2,022 cited
  • 2015The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013)510 cited
  • 2017Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals229 cited
  • 2013Just Post It216 cited
  • 2020False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia172 cited
  • 2020Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills?133 cited
  • 2016The GRIM Test127 cited
  • 2020Check for publication integrity before misconduct113 cited
  • 2007eTBLAST: a web server to identify expert reviewers, appropriate journals and similar publications

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

99 cited
  • 2021Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review68 cited
  • 2020Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women’ health65 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.