SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Narrative reanalysis: A methodological framework for a new brand of reviews
16 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Narrative reanalysis: A methodological framework for a new brand of reviews (2024)Narrative reanalysis: A methodological fr…JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2024)JBI Manual for Evidence Synth…Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching (2022)Citationchaser: A tool for tr…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial (2020)Single-reviewer abstract scre…Teacher stress interventions: A systematic review (2019)Teacher stress interventions:…Methods for Research Evidence Synthesis: The Scoping Review Approach (2019)Methods for Research Evidence…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)Time to challenge the spuriou…Writing Integrative Literature Reviews (2016)Writing Integrative Literatur…Writing narrative style literature reviews (2015)Writing narrative style liter…JBI's Systematic Reviews (2014)JBI's Systematic ReviewsTesting Methodological Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews (2009)Testing Methodological Guidan…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Using thematic analysis in ps…Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Three Approaches to Qualitati…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place (2015)Thematic Analysis (2017)Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis (2019)Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Review of green and sustainable public procurement: Towards circular public procurement (2019)Sustainability in e-commerce packaging: A review (2020)The blended future of automation and AI: Examining some long-term societal and ethical impact features (2023)Research in Organizational Behavior. (1986)What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? (1989)Advancing Theory with Review Articles (2019)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Creating High‐Impact Literature Reviews: An Argument for ‘Integrative Reviews’ (2020)Innovation in the Era of IoT and Industry 5.0: Absolute Innovation Management (AIM) Framework (2020)Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (2002)The integrative review: updated methodology (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies (2020)A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm (2020)Narrative Reviews: Flexible, Rigorous, and Practical (2022)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Healthcare workers’ (HCWs) attitudes and related factors towards COVID-19 vaccination: a rapid systematic review (2021)ABC of a Scoping Review: A Simplified JBI Scoping Review Guideline (2024)Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Using thematic analysis in psychology193,725 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2005Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis44,511 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2024JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis2,455 cited
  • 2015Writing narrative style literature reviews1,900 cited
  • 2016Writing Integrative Literature Reviews1,356 cited
  • 2018Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?1,254 cited
  • 2022Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching602 cited
  • 2009Testing Methodological Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews561 cited
  • 2014JBI's Systematic Reviews515 cited
  • 2019Methods for Research Evidence Synthesis: The Scoping Review Approach490 cited
  • 2019Teacher stress interventions: A systematic review239 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial206 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.