SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What we should learn from pandemic publishing
9 references·0 citing·42 second hop
What we should learn from pandemic publishing (2024)What we should learn from pandemic publis…More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record (2023)More than 10,000 research pap…Public engagement with science—Origins, motives and impact in academic literature and science policy (2021)Public engagement with scienc…Interdisciplinary researchers attain better long-term funding performance (2021)Interdisciplinary researchers…Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID ‐19: A bibliometric analysis (2021)Evolution of scientific colla…Will the pandemic permanently alter scientific publishing? (2020)Will the pandemic permanently…Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge (2020)Pandemic publishing poses a n…Early in the epidemic: impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility (2020)Early in the epidemic: impact…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity (2015)The Importance of Domain-Spec…Review of Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). (1979)The Social Psychology of Creativity (1983)Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity (1996)Approaches to Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review (2017)Artificial muses: Generative artificial intelligence chatbots have risen to human-level creativity (2023)Establishing the importance of co-creation and self-efficacy in creative collaboration with artificial intelligence (2024)Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (2018)Keep up with the latest coronavirus research (2020)LitCovid: an open database of COVID-19 literature (2020)Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 (2020)Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature (2020)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks (2010)Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting (2016)How the Covid-19 crisis shaped research collaboration behaviour (2022)Opening the black box of Library Hi Tech: a social network and bibliometric analysis (2023)Research Output, Key Topics, and Trends in Productivity, Visibility, and Collaboration in Social Sciences Research on COVID-19: A Scientometric Analysis and Visualization (2024)A Ladder Of Citizen Participation (1969)A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms (2005)Social Research Methods (2013)Trust or attention? Medialization of science revisited (2022)Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review (2023)Undergraduate STEM Students’ Science Communication Skills, Science Identity, and Science Self-Efficacy Influence Their Motivations and Behaviors in STEM Community Engagement (2023)Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study (2000)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science (2008)Delayed citation impact of interdisciplinary research (2023)Interdisciplinary research and technological impact: evidence from biomedicine (2023)Interdisciplinary Approaches in Doctoral and Higher Research Education: An Integrative Scoping Review (2025)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science” (2020)Communicating Scientific Uncertainty in an Age of COVID-19: An Investigation into the Use of Preprints by Digital Media Outlets (2021)COVID-19-related medical research: a meta-research and critical appraisal (2021)Positive and negative impact of social media in the COVID-19 era (2020)The Impacts of COVID-19 on the Research Enterprise (2020)African authorship on African papers during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (2024)Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review (2024)Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2023More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record354 cited
  • 2015The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity263 cited
  • 2020Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge259 cited
  • 2020Early in the epidemic: impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility196 cited
  • 2021Public engagement with science—Origins, motives and impact in academic literature and science policy180 cited
  • 2020Will the pandemic permanently alter scientific publishing?111 cited
  • 2021Interdisciplinary researchers attain better long-term funding performance76 cited
  • 2021Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID ‐19: A bibliometric analysis26 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work