SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Harnessing artificial intelligence for efficient systematic reviews: A case study in ecosystem condition indicators
16 references·0 citing·49 second hopsampled
Harnessing artificial intelligence for efficient systematic reviews: A case study in ecosystem condition indicators (2024)Harnessing artificial intelligence for ef…Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review (2022)Using artificial intelligence…Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review (2021)Tools to support the automati…Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases (2021)Growth rates of modern scienc…Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Automation of systematic lite…The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)The ABC of systematic literat…PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and e…GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences (2020)GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Lim…Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews (2020)Error rates of human reviewer…Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error (2019)Machine learning algorithms f…ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (2018)ROSES RepOrting standards for…Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making (2018)Interrater Reliability in Sys…Will your paper be used in a meta‐analysis? Make the reach of your research broader and longer lasting (2017)Will your paper be used in a …Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews (2015)Making literature reviews mor…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Advancing literature review methodology through rigour, generativity, scope and transparency (2022)Customer engagement and social media: Revisiting the past to inform the future (2022)Memorable tourism experience: A review and research agenda (2022)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A systematic literature review of the role of trust and security on Fintech adoption in banking (2023)Environmental-, social-, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustainability: a scientometric review of global trends (2023)The critiques and criticisms of positive psychology: a systematic review (2023)I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE (1950)Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation (1976)Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) (2004)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)Little Science, Big Science (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Science education in an age of misinformation (2023)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature (2023)Machine learning in crime prediction (2023)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Reporting guidelines for Delphi techniques in health sciences: A methodological review (2022)The state of evidence for social and emotional learning: A contemporary meta-analysis of universal school-based SEL interventions (2023)Delphi studies in social and health sciences—Recommendations for an interdisciplinary standardized reporting (DELPHISTAR). Results of a Delphi study (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2020GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences2,513 cited
  • 2018ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps944 cited
  • 2020PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews916 cited
  • 2018Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making753 cited
  • 2020The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners655 cited
  • 2021Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases504 cited
  • 2021Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review430 cited
  • 2015Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews417 cited
  • 2022Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review222 cited
  • 2020Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

214 cited
  • 2021Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review189 cited
  • 2019Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error185 cited
  • 2017Will your paper be used in a meta‐analysis? Make the reach of your research broader and longer lasting159 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.