Citation map · Study

THE IMPACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING SYSTEM (EMAS) ADOPTION PHASES ON SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE: A SOCIAL ISSUE LIFE CYCLE THEORY APPROACH

16 references·1 citing·49 second hopsampled

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2018Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance749 cited
2018Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management's commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting537 cited
2021Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance386 cited
2020Institutional pressures, environmental management strategy, and organizational performance: The role of environmental management accounting219 cited
2017Linking environmental strategy to environmental performance175 cited
2022The role of environmental management accounting and environmental knowledge management practices influence on environmental performance: mediated-moderated model169 cited
2019Diffusion of environmental management accounting for cleaner production: Evidence from some case studies169 cited
2022Corporate sustainability management accounting and multi‐level links for sustainability – A systematic review163 cited
2015Environmental Management Accounting Practices in Small Medium Manufacturing Firms128 cited
2015Pragmatism and new directions in social and environmental accountability research128 cited
2003The Issue Life-Cycle: Implications for Reputation for Social Performance and Organizational Legitimacy117 cited
2022The impact of environmental management accounting on environmental and financial performance: empirical evidence from Bangladesh114 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by