Debate: Trust and accountability—consequences for the quality of policy advice

Matthew Collins

3 citations0/0 files storedPublic Money & Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Policy and Administration Research Administrative Law and Governance Public Administration and Governance

Abstract

Civil servants in the UK have no legal personality (Armstrong, 1985; Richards & Smith, 2016). Ministers do, however, and that means that every decision taken, or action performed by the civil servi...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Comparing Westminster 2007TRUTH IN GOVERNMENT AND THE POLITICIZATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE ADVICE 2000The Art of the State 2016Assessing 30 years of Westminster policy advisory system experience 2016The Westminster Model and the “Indivisibility of the Political and Administrative Elite”: A Convenient Myth Whose Time Is Up?2010The Declining Talent Pool of Government 2020Public servant stereotypes: It is not (at) all about being lazy, greedy and corrupt 2023Understanding Accountability in Democratic Governance

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.