When the Future Decides
Abstract
Young Beti women in Cameroon regularly assert that because they are uncertain about what the future will bring, they cannot make any plans. But they do plan, strategize, and indeed act quite effectively. The purpose of this paper is to explain how they do so, specifically in reference to marriage and reproduction, and thereby to contribute to a general understanding of intentionality, uncertainty, and social action. Action has been commonly theorized as the fulfillment of a prior intention. But uncertainties, both the probabilistic uncertainty of events and the subjects experience of uncertainty, threaten to dissolve the link between intention and its fulfillment. This paper argues that, at least under the conditions of uncertainty applicable in contemporary Africa, effective social action is based not on the fulfillment of prior intentions but on a judicious opportunism: the actor seizes promising chances. In other words, womens negation of Weberian rational action is not a lack; by engaging in heterogeneous activities without a clear trajectory in mind, they are able to get by. The paper makes this argument on the basis of ethnographic and demographic data from Cameroon and theoretical analyses of the work of Searle, Schutz, and Hume.
Cite this
Jennifer A. Johnson-Hanks (2005). When the Future Decides. Current Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1086/428799
@article{a2005when,
title = {When the Future Decides},
author = {Johnson-Hanks, Jennifer A.},
year = {2005},
journal = {Current Anthropology},
doi = {10.1086/428799}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 247 citations exist upstream.