Architecture and bioethics: investigating the ethical implications of recent advances in the field of neuroarchitecture

Abstract

In recent years the field of neuroarchitecture has gained prominence as an interdisciplinary domain that explores the influence of the built environment on human brain function, behavior, cognition, and psychological well-being. This emerging research domain highlights the profound and intricate connections between architecture and occupant health and wellbeing outcomes. While health and safety concerns have been increasingly integrated into regulatory mechanisms, understanding the ramifications of variations in spatial design on the health and wellbeing of building occupants is complex. Emergent research within neuroarchitecture raises fundamental questions regarding the ethical obligations of architects, designers, commissioning organizations, client groups, design educators, builders, and regulatory bodies. This paper considers the question: To what extent do recent research findings in neuroarchitecture impact on, and even reshape, architects’ ethical duties? Given the complexity of building procurement processes, where do the moral and ethical obligations lie for the wellbeing of the end building occupant? This paper explores some of the ethical implications of advances in neuroarchitecture, and advocates for a better understanding of the neurophysiological impact of the built environment to help bridge current knowledge gaps, and develop evidence-based practices that support design for wellbeing.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.