SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Enabling preprint discovery, evaluation, and analysis with Europe PMC
16 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Enabling preprint discovery, evaluation, and analysis with Europe PMC (2024)Enabling preprint discovery, evaluation, …scite: A smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning (2021)scite: A smart citation index…Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting (2020)Systematic examination of pre…Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals (2020)Peer review and preprint poli…Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Which academic search systems…Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)Preprints and Scholarly Commu…On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)On the value of preprints: An…bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology (2019)bioRxiv: the preprint server …Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science (2018)Preprints: An underutilized m…Persistent Underrepresentation of Women’s Science in High Profile Journals (2018)Persistent Underrepresentatio…Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review (2018)Author-Reviewer Homophily in …Preprints for the life sciences (2016)Preprints for the life scienc…Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Why Has the Number of Scienti…The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)The publishing delay in schol…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals (2006)Predictors of publication: ch…Gender bias in the refereeing process? (2002)Gender bias in the refereeing…The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process (2000)Prominent but Less Productive (2016)CORD-19: The COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (2020)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism (1995)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)US and Non-US Submissions (1998)Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants (2006)Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches (2009)The gendered nature of authorship (2021)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)Exploratory Research (2020)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Accelerating scientific publication in biology (2015)Does it take too long to publish research? (2016)Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission (2017)Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2020)The Pandemic Penalty: The Gendered Effects of COVID-19 on Scientific Productivity (2021)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)Rise of the Rxivs: How Preprint Servers are Changing the Publishing Process (2020)Reliability and Validity Assessment (1979)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research (2020)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace (2018)The unequal impact of parenthood in academia (2021)Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration (2023)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Increased Amygdala and Insula Activation During Emotion Processing in Anxiety-Prone Subjects (2007)A decade of in-text citation analysis based on natural language processing and machine learning techniques: an overview of empirical studies (2021)Beyond Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: An evaluation of the backward and forward citation coverage of 59 databases' citation indices (2024)How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools (2024)Changing scientific meetings for the better (2021)Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources2,361 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2013The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals432 cited
  • 2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
  • 2019On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective184 cited
  • 2016Preprints for the life sciences178 cited
  • 2018Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review169 cited
  • 2021scite: A smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning158 cited
  • 2002Gender bias in the refereeing process?141 cited
  • 2019bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology140 cited
  • 2018Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science136 cited
  • 2006Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals130 cited
  • 2020Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting112 cited
  • 2018Persistent Underrepresentation of Women’s Science in High Profile Journals91 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals89 cited
  • 2019Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers79 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.