SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluation of an Autonomous Vehicle User Interface for Sensory Impaired Users
5 references·0 citing·25 second hop
Evaluation of an Autonomous Vehicle User Interface for Sensory Impaired Users (2024)Evaluation of an Autonomous Vehicle User …Willingness of people who are blind to accept autonomous vehicles: An empirical investigation (2020)Willingness of people who are…Shaping driver-vehicle interaction in autonomous vehicles: How the new in-vehicle systems match the human needs (2020)Shaping driver-vehicle intera…A Wizard of Oz Field Study to Understand Non-Driving-Related Activities, Trust, and Acceptance of Automated Vehicles (2020)A Wizard of Oz Field Study to…Universal Design of User Interfaces in Self-driving Cars (2017)Universal Design of User Inte…How Do Drivers Behave in a Highly Automated Car? (2009)How Do Drivers Behave in a Hi…Ironies of automation (1983)Behind Human Error: Cognitive Systems, Computers and Hindsight (1994)Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. (2000)Potential Solutions to Human Factors Challenges in Road Vehicle Automation (2016)Brain–Computer Interface-Based Adaptive Automation to Prevent Out-Of-The-Loop Phenomenon in Air Traffic Controllers Dealing With Highly Automated Systems (2019)Effects of cognitive and visual loads on driving performance after take-over request (TOR) in automated driving (2020)Executive function across the life span (2004)Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance (2014)Auditing Web accessibility: The role of interest organizations in promoting compliance through certification (2015)Are consumers willing to pay to let cars drive for them? Analyzing response to autonomous vehicles (2017)Building Trust in Autonomous Vehicles: Role of Virtual Reality Driving Simulators in HMI Design (2019)From car sickness to autonomous car sickness: A review (2019)Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. (1966)The Structure of Coping (1978)A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder (2006)Users’ acceptance of private automated vehicles: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Travel behavior of visually impaired people before and during COVID-19 (2023)When Technology Becomes a Barrier: The Accessibility Issue in Mobility Interfaces (2026)A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies (2000)User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1 (2003)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)The Role of Field Trips in Teacher Education for Teaching Social Studies in a Developing Country (2023)Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems (1995)Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design (2003)“Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009How Do Drivers Behave in a Highly Automated Car?109 cited
  • 2020Willingness of people who are blind to accept autonomous vehicles: An empirical investigation88 cited
  • 2020Shaping driver-vehicle interaction in autonomous vehicles: How the new in-vehicle systems match the human needs86 cited
  • 2020A Wizard of Oz Field Study to Understand Non-Driving-Related Activities, Trust, and Acceptance of Automated Vehicles71 cited
  • 2017Universal Design of User Interfaces in Self-driving Cars13 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work