SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Many randomized trials in a large systematic review were not registered and had evidence of selective outcome reporting: a metaepidemiological study
16 references·0 citing·52 second hopsampled
Many randomized trials in a large systematic review were not registered and had evidence of selective outcome reporting: a metaepidemiological study (2024)Many randomized trials in a large systema…Catalogue of bias: novelty bias (2023)Catalogue of bias: novelty bi…Registration and primary outcome reporting in behavioral health trials (2022)Registration and primary outc…Clinical trial registration was associated with lower risk of bias compared with non-registered trials among trials included in systematic reviews (2022)Clinical trial registration w…Meta-epidemiological study of publication integrity, and quality of conduct and reporting of randomized trials included in a systematic review of low back pain (2021)Meta-epidemiological study of…No evidence found for an association between trial characteristics and treatment effects in randomized trials of testosterone therapy in men: a meta-epidemiological study (2020)No evidence found for an asso…Prevalence of trial registration varies by study characteristics and risk of bias (2019)Prevalence of trial registrat…How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)How to perform a meta-analysi…Registered trials report less beneficial treatment effects than unregistered ones: a meta-epidemiological study in orthodontics (2018)Registered trials report less…Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Guidelines for reporting meta…Association between trial registration and positive study findings: cross sectional study (Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials—ESORT) (2017)Association between trial reg…Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study (2016)Association between trial reg…2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group (2015)2015 Updated Method Guideline…The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method (2014)The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkm…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials (2017)Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance (2020)Understanding a Player’s Decision-Making Process in Team Sports: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence (2021)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited (2015)Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis (2016)Socioeconomic status and the 25 × 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: a multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1·7 million men and women (2017)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Registration of published randomized trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2018)Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies (2019)The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses (2019)Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials (2012)The preregistration revolution (2018)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials (2019)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect (2017)Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale: A meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions (2019)A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study (2020)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2021)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)An adoption-implementation framework of digital green knowledge to improve the performance of digital green innovation practices for industry 5.0 (2022)netmeta : An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods (2023)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Assessing Publication Bias: a 7-Step User’s Guide with Best-Practice Recommendations (2022)Prospective registration of trials: where we are, why, and how we could get better (2024)The majority of observational studies in leading peer-reviewed medicine journals are not registered and do not have a publicly accessible protocol: a scoping review (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,882 cited
  • 2019How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial5,858 cited
  • 2014The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method2,504 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
  • 20152015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group707 cited
  • 2017Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research516 cited
  • 2016Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study72 cited
  • 2022Clinical trial registration was associated with lower risk of bias compared with non-registered trials among trials included in systematic reviews52 cited
  • 2017Association between trial registration and positive study findings: cross sectional study (Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials—ESORT)51 cited
  • 2021Meta-epidemiological study of publication integrity, and quality of conduct and reporting of randomized trials included in a systematic review of low back pain36 cited
  • 2019Prevalence of trial registration varies by study characteristics and risk of bias35 cited
  • 2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Registered trials report less beneficial treatment effects than unregistered ones: a meta-epidemiological study in orthodontics
34 cited
  • 2020No evidence found for an association between trial characteristics and treatment effects in randomized trials of testosterone therapy in men: a meta-epidemiological study24 cited
  • 2023Catalogue of bias: novelty bias19 cited
  • 2022Registration and primary outcome reporting in behavioral health trials14 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.