SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Exploring the role of rejection in scholarly knowledge production: Insights from granular interaction thinking and information theory
8 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Exploring the role of rejection in scholarly knowledge production: Insights from granular interaction thinking and information theory (2024)Exploring the role of rejection in schola…Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing (2023)Can linguists distinguish bet…Reform retractions to make them more transparent (2020)Reform retractions to make th…Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2020)Comparing quality of reportin…The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 (2019)The limitations of retraction…Reproducibility of Scientific Results (2018)Reproducibility of Scientific…Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Problems and challenges of pr…The Social and Psychological Costs of Peer Review (2015)The Social and Psychological …Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process…Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (1969)Stress, appraisal, and coping (1985)Stress: Appraisal and Coping (2013)Theory in humanitarian operations research (2016)Non-English Nativeness As Stigma in Academic Settings (2017)Academic Arrhythmia: Disruption, Dissonance, and Conflict in the Early-Career Rhythms of CMS Academics (2019)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis (2019)Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review (2020)Big data analytics in manufacturing: a bibliometric analysis of research in the field of business management (2021)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The (ir)rational consideration of the cost of science in transition economies (2017)Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data (2020)Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future (2020)Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors (2021)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting (2020)Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic (2022)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (1988)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines (2020)Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review (2023)Assessing the nexus of Generative AI adoption, ethical considerations and organizational performance (2024)Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement (2024)Computational Reproducibility via Containers in Psychology (2019)Replications in Comparative Cognition: What Should We Expect and How Can We Improve? (2020)A Systematic Literature Review of Game-Based Assessment Studies: Trends and Challenges (2022)Alice in Suicideland: Exploring the Suicidal Ideation Mechanism through the Sense of Connectedness and Help-Seeking Behaviors (2021)Bosses without a heart: socio-demographic and cross-cultural determinants of attitude toward Emotional AI in the workplace (2021)Building eco-surplus culture among urban residents as a novel strategy to improve finance for conservation in protected areas (2022)Scientific peer review (2011)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020Reform retractions to make them more transparent1,075 cited
  • 2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals868 cited
  • 2023Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing260 cited
  • 2018Problems and challenges of predatory journals227 cited
  • 2018Reproducibility of Scientific Results199 cited
  • 2020Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature146 cited
  • 2019The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019126 cited
  • 2015The Social and Psychological Costs of Peer Review57 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work