SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
AI-assisted prescreening of biomedical research proposals: ethical considerations and the pilot case of “la Caixa” Foundation
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
AI-assisted prescreening of biomedical research proposals: ethical considerations and the pilot case of “la Caixa” Foundation (2024)AI-assisted prescreening of biomedical re…GPTs are GPTs: Labor market impact potential of LLMs (2024)GPTs are GPTs: Labor market i…Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)Can Large Language Models Pro…The Brussels Effect and Artificial Intelligence (2022)The Brussels Effect and Artif…Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers? (2022)Should peer reviewers be paid…Is the future of peer review automated? (2022)Is the future of peer review …Challenges, experiments, and computational solutions in peer review (2022)Challenges, experiments, and …AI-assisted peer review (2021)AI-assisted peer reviewA billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review (2021)A billion-dollar donation: es…“statcheck”: Automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility of meta‐analyses (2020)“statcheck”: Automatically de…Academic Plagiarism Detection (2019)Academic Plagiarism DetectionAuthor-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review (2018)Author-Reviewer Homophily in …Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (2017)Weapons of Math Destruction: …Multimodal First Impression Analysis with Deep Residual Networks (2017)Multimodal First Impression A…IEEE standard review — Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human wellbeing with artificial intelligence and autonomous systems (2017)IEEE standard review — Ethica…Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewUnderstanding expert ratings of essay quality: Coh-Metrix analyses of first and second language writing (2011)Understanding expert ratings …Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (1994)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Toward a model of text comprehension and production. (1978)Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text (1996)Cohesion in English (2014)Automated measurement of syntactic complexity in corpus-based L2 writing research and implications for writing assessment (2017)Illusions of truth—Experimental insights into human and algorithmic detections of fake online reviews (2018)Assessing the Validity of Lexical Diversity Indices Using Direct Judgements (2020)Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think (2013)Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think (2014)Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject (2018)Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control (2019)Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence systems—An introductory survey (2020)Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews (2004)Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art (2012)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Testing of Support Tools for Plagiarism Detection (2019)What are Automated Paraphrasing Tools and how do we address them? A review of a growing threat to academic integrity (2022)Evaluating the authenticity of ChatGPT responses: a study on text-matching capabilities (2023)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace (2018)The unequal impact of parenthood in academia (2021)Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration (2023)Big Data's Disparate Impact (2014)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process (2021)Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance (2023)The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future (2024)Science Since Babylon (1961)Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education (2022)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’? (1995)The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment (2018)ChatGPT Undermines Human Reflexivity, Scientific Responsibility and Responsible Management Research (2023)AI adoption in America: Who, what, and where (2024)The unequal adoption of ChatGPT exacerbates existing inequalities among workers (2024)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)Art and the science of generative AI (2023)ChatGPT-supported collaborative argumentation: Integrating collaboration script and argument mapping to enhance EFL students’ argumentation skills (2024)The grass is not always greener: Teacher vs. GPT-assisted written corrective feedback (2024)Quantifying large language model usage in scientific papers (2025)Human-aligned artificial intelligence is a multiobjective problem (2017)“Please understand we cannot provide further information”: evaluating content and transparency of GDPR-mandated AI disclosures (2022)Development and validation of an instrument to measure undergraduate students’ attitudes toward the ethics of artificial intelligence (AT-EAI) and analysis of its difference by gender and experience of AI education (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy3,071 cited
  • 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
  • 2024GPTs are GPTs: Labor market impact potential of LLMs826 cited
  • 2021A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review305 cited
  • 2021AI-assisted peer review284 cited
  • 2024Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis253 cited
  • 2019Academic Plagiarism Detection237 cited
  • 2017IEEE standard review — Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human wellbeing with artificial intelligence and autonomous systems218 cited
  • 2018Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review169 cited
  • 2011Understanding expert ratings of essay quality: Coh-Metrix analyses of first and second language writing103 cited
  • 2022Is the future of peer review automated?80 cited
  • 2017Multimodal First Impression Analysis with Deep Residual Networks76 cited
  • 2022Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers?71 cited
  • 2022Challenges, experiments, and computational solutions in peer review66 cited
  • 2022The Brussels Effect and Artificial Intelligence

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

58 cited
  • 2020“statcheck”: Automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility of meta‐analyses56 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.