SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Citation and bibliographic coupling between authors in the field of social network analysis
16 references·0 citing·32 second hop
Citation and bibliographic coupling between authors in the field of social network analysis (2024)Citation and bibliographic coupling betwe…Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Scopus as a curated, high-qua…Science of science (2018)Science of scienceBibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? (2010)Co‐citation analysis, bibliog…Historiographic Mapping of Knowledge Domains Literature (2004)Historiographic Mapping of Kn…The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology (2003)The Network Paradigm in Organ…Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences (2002)Social network analysis: a po…Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 (1998)Visualizing a discipline: An …Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)Problems of citation analysis…Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure (1981)Author cocitation: A literatu…Cited Documents as Concept Symbols (1978)Cited Documents as Concept Sy…Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Co‐citation in the scientific…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Citation Analysis as a Tool i…Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Networks of Scientific PapersLittle Science, Big Science (1963)Little Science, Big ScienceBibliographic coupling between scientific papers (1963)Bibliographic coupling betwee…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The Strength of Weak Ties (1973)Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. (1994)Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda (2007)Organizational Social Network Research:Core Ideas and Key Debates (2010)On Network Theory (2011)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2015)Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines (2020)The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science (2020)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Learning by Expanding (2014)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization (2004)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community (2005)Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals (2007)Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1973Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents5,334 cited
  • 1963Little Science, Big Science4,272 cited
  • 2003The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology3,247 cited
  • 1965Networks of Scientific Papers3,124 cited
  • 1963Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers2,873 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation2,781 cited
  • 2020Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies2,084 cited
  • 2002Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences1,711 cited
  • 2018Science of science1,494 cited
  • 2010Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?1,436 cited
  • 1998Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–19951,307 cited
  • 1981Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure1,221 cited
  • 1989Problems of citation analysis: A critical review803 cited
  • 1978Cited Documents as Concept Symbols

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

600 cited
  • 2004Historiographic Mapping of Knowledge Domains Literature443 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.