SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open science practices among authors published in complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: An international, cross-sectional survey
11 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Open science practices among authors published in complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: An international, cross-sectional survey (2024)Open science practices among authors publ…Complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine researchers’ practices and perceived barriers related to open science: An international, cross-sectional survey (2024)Complementary, alternative, a…Registered report: Survey on attitudes and experiences regarding preregistration in psychological research (2023)Registered report: Survey on …Open Science: Open Data, Open Models, …and Open Publications? (2021)Open Science: Open Data, Open…Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Open science challenges, bene…The future(s) of open science (2018)The future(s) of open scienceOpen Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition (2018)Open Science now: A systemati…How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)How open science helps resear…Big Science, Team Science, and Open Science for Neuroscience (2016)Big Science, Team Science, an…Institutional Inertia and Barriers to the Adoption of Open Science (2015)Institutional Inertia and Bar…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)Improving the Quality of Web …THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Open access publications in sciences and social sciences: A comparative analysis (2017)Using Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) to showcase national and institutional research (potential): research information systems in the context of Open Science (2019)Open synthesis and the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python (2011)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Predicting the replicability of social science lab experiments (2019)Predicting the Replicability of Social Science Lab Experiments (2019)Exploring the changing geographical pattern of international scientific collaborations through the prism of cities (2020)Toward a new economics of science (1994)Open innovation : researching a new paradigm (2006)Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review (2020)The Future of Sensitivity Analysis: An essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support (2020)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)The Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready (2015)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Public engagement with science—Origins, motives and impact in academic literature and science policy (2021)Philosophy of Open Science (2023)Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows (2016)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)The case for open computer programs (2012)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Investigating the nature of open science practices across complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: An audit (2024)The theory of planned behavior (1991)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Supporting study registration to reduce research waste (2024)Methodological quality in randomised clinical trials of mental health apps: systematic review and longitudinal analysis (2025)Open Science in the Developing World: A Collection of Practical Guides for Researchers in Developing Countries (2025)A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians (2008)Knowledge and Perceptions of COVID-19 Among Health Care Workers: Cross-Sectional Study (2020)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies21,132 cited
  • 2004Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)6,450 cited
  • 2016How open science helps researchers succeed790 cited
  • 2018Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition709 cited
  • 2019Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond605 cited
  • 2018The future(s) of open science372 cited
  • 2016Big Science, Team Science, and Open Science for Neuroscience89 cited
  • 2021Open Science: Open Data, Open Models, …and Open Publications?34 cited
  • 2023Registered report: Survey on attitudes and experiences regarding preregistration in psychological research32 cited
  • 2015Institutional Inertia and Barriers to the Adoption of Open Science25 cited
  • 2024Complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine researchers’ practices and perceived barriers related to open science: An international, cross-sectional survey15 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work