SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Concordance between humans and GPT-4 in appraising the methodological quality of case reports and case series using the Murad tool
16 references·0 citing·51 second hopsampled
Concordance between humans and GPT-4 in appraising the methodological quality of case reports and case series using the Murad tool (2024)Concordance between humans and GPT-4 in a…Integrating large language models in systematic reviews: a framework and case study using ROBINS-I for risk of bias assessment (2024)Integrating large language mo…Automation of literature screening using machine learning in medical evidence synthesis: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review protocol (2022)Automation of literature scre…Automated medical literature screening using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)Automated medical literature …Kappa and Beyond: Is There Agreement? (2020)Kappa and Beyond: Is There Ag…Comparing machine and human reviewers to evaluate the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (2020)Comparing machine and human r…Case study research for better evaluations of complex interventions: rationale and challenges (2020)Case study research for bette…Protect us from poor-quality medical research (2018)Protect us from poor-quality …Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports (2018)Methodological quality and sy…How to choose the best journal for your case report (2017)How to choose the best journa…Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Guidelines for reporting meta…Is Quality and Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Published in High Impact Radiology Journals Associated with Citation Rates? (2015)Is Quality and Completeness o…Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers (2013)Testing the Newcastle Ottawa …A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013)A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa…Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Transparent and accurate repo…Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research (2008)Case Selection Techniques in …Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement (2006)Computing inter‐rater reliabi…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Quality assessment of observational studies in a drug-safety systematic review, comparison of two tools: the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the RTI item bank (2014)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research (2016)No clear choice between Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies to assess methodological quality in cross-sectional studies of health-related quality of life and breast cancer (2019)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2011)Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)The three worlds of welfare capitalism (1990)Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method? (2007)Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets (2010)A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension (2020)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect (2017)Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale: A meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions (2019)A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study (2020)In Defense of Case Reports and Case Series (2001)Meta-analysis of prevalence (2013)Methodological quality of case series studies (2019)Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence (2021)Methodological quality of COVID-19 clinical research (2021)High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes (1990)Interobserver variability studies in diagnostic imaging: a methodological systematic review (2023)When Do We Act under Non-Coercive Circumstances (2023)A Systematic Review of Guided, Parent-Led Digital Interventions for Preadolescent Children with Emotional and Behavioural Problems (2025)The Art of Case Study Research (1996)Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research (2004)Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (2017)We Need to Talk About Complexity in Health Research: Findings From a Focused Ethnography (2020)The use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to address causality in complex systems: a systematic review of research on public health interventions (2021)Uptake of Mpox vaccination among transgender people and gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men among sexually-transmitted infection clinic clients in Vancouver, British Columbia (2023)Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Sensitivity and Specificity of Using GPT-3.5 Turbo Models for Title and Abstract Screening in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (2024)Collaborative large language models for automated data extraction in living systematic reviews (2025)Language models for data extraction and risk of bias assessment in complementary medicine (2025)International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (2013)Social networks, social capital, social support and academic success in higher education: A systematic review with a special focus on ‘underrepresented’ students (2019)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2008Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research3,818 cited
  • 2018Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports2,235 cited
  • 2006Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement2,139 cited
  • 2013A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples1,021 cited
  • 2010Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network589 cited
  • 2017Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research514 cited
  • 2013Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers437 cited
  • 2020Case study research for better evaluations of complex interventions: rationale and challenges175 cited
  • 2020Kappa and Beyond: Is There Agreement?173 cited
  • 2024Integrating large language models in systematic reviews: a framework and case study using ROBINS-I for risk of bias assessment72 cited
  • 2017How to choose the best journal for your case report67 cited
  • 2022Automated medical literature screening using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis62 cited
  • 2018Protect us from poor-quality medical research59 cited
  • 2015Is Quality and Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Published in High Impact Radiology Journals Associated with Citation Rates?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

56 cited
  • 2022Automation of literature screening using machine learning in medical evidence synthesis: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review protocol44 cited
  • 2020Comparing machine and human reviewers to evaluate the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials30 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.