SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Enhancing research methods: The role of systematic and scoping reviews in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation
5 references·1 citing·23 second hop
Enhancing research methods: The role of systematic and scoping reviews in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation (2024)Enhancing research methods: The role of s…Improving the reliability of measurements in orthopaedics and sports medicine (2023)Improving the reliability of …Checklists, risk of bias tools, and reporting guidelines for research in orthopedics, sports medicine, and rehabilitation (2023)Checklists, risk of bias tool…Why there is a need to improve evaluation standards for clinical studies in orthopaedic and sports medicine (2022)Why there is a need to improv…Author guidelines for conducting systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2021)Author guidelines for conduct…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …Global research landscapes in orthopaedic and traumatology systematic reviews: A bibliometric analysis of trends, impact, and evolution (2025)Global research landscapes in…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Evaluating the Reliability of MyotonPro in Assessing Muscle Properties: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2024)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Evidence‐based research in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation—Why new studies should rely on earlier work (2024)Structured success: Study protocols and preregistration in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation (2024)Teamwork is needed now: Time to focus on collaboration, rehabilitation and patients' needs! (2024)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research (2016)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2021Author guidelines for conducting systematic reviews and meta‐analyses86 cited
  • 2023Checklists, risk of bias tools, and reporting guidelines for research in orthopedics, sports medicine, and rehabilitation65 cited
  • 2023Improving the reliability of measurements in orthopaedics and sports medicine59 cited
  • 2022Why there is a need to improve evaluation standards for clinical studies in orthopaedic and sports medicine29 cited

Cited by

  • 2025Global research landscapes in orthopaedic and traumatology systematic reviews: A bibliometric analysis of trends, impact, and evolution7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work