SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reviewability and supportability: New complementary principles to empower research software practices
16 references·0 citing·45 second hop
Reviewability and supportability: New complementary principles to empower research software practices (2024)Reviewability and supportability: New com…Bias of AI-generated content: an examination of news produced by large language models (2024)Bias of AI-generated content:…Is AI leading to a reproducibility crisis in science? (2023)Is AI leading to a reproducib…Towards FAIR principles for research software (2019)Towards FAIR principles for r…Ten simple rules for writing and sharing computational analyses in Jupyter Notebooks (2019)Ten simple rules for writing …Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Evaluating the replicability …Ten simple rules for making research software more robust (2017)Ten simple rules for making r…Ten Simple Rules for Taking Advantage of Git and GitHub (2016)Ten Simple Rules for Taking A…When contact changes minds: An experiment on transmission of support for gay equality (2014)When contact changes minds: A…Best Practices for Scientific Computing (2014)Best Practices for Scientific…Troubling Trends in Scientific Software Use (2013)Troubling Trends in Scientifi…Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research (2013)Ten Simple Rules for Reproduc…Ten Simple Rules for the Open Development of Scientific Software (2012)Ten Simple Rules for the Open…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…The ups and downs of peer review (2007)The ups and downs of peer rev…A Scientist's Nightmare: Software Problem Leads to Five Retractions (2006)A Scientist's Nightmare: Soft…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows (2004)Galaxy: A platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis (2005)Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences (2010)Reproducibility in Science (2014)Good enough practices in scientific computing. (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Scientists behaving badly (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)The New Encyclopaedia Britannica (1991)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications (2014)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)WaveLab and Reproducible Research (1995)Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science (2013)Four simple recommendations to encourage best practices in research software (2017)Heterogeneous green innovations and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China's city level (2021)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)BioContainers: an open-source and community-driven framework for software standardization (2017)Bayesian Analysis Reporting Guidelines (2021)Reproducible, scalable, and shareable analysis pipelines with bioinformatics workflow managers (2021)A large-scale study on research code quality and execution (2022)Bias in computer systems (1996)Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations (2019)The Psychology of Fake News (2021)Beyond principlism: practical strategies for ethical AI use in research practices (2024)The form of AI-driven luxury: how generative AI (GAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming the creative process (2024)How was my performance? Exploring the role of anchoring bias in AI-assisted decision making (2025)Provenance (2009)Better Software, Better Research (2014)Sources of error in the retracted scientific literature (2014)Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools (2017)A Large-Scale Study About Quality and Reproducibility of Jupyter Notebooks (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2018Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 20151,519 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2013Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research875 cited
  • 2014Best Practices for Scientific Computing715 cited
  • 2019Towards FAIR principles for research software322 cited
  • 2007The ups and downs of peer review296 cited
  • 2016Ten Simple Rules for Taking Advantage of Git and GitHub231 cited
  • 2006A Scientist's Nightmare: Software Problem Leads to Five Retractions201 cited
  • 2024Bias of AI-generated content: an examination of news produced by large language models193 cited
  • 2013Troubling Trends in Scientific Software Use189 cited
  • 2019Ten simple rules for writing and sharing computational analyses in Jupyter Notebooks168 cited
  • 2012Ten Simple Rules for the Open Development of Scientific Software143 cited
  • 2014When contact changes minds: An experiment on transmission of support for gay equality113 cited
  • 2017Ten simple rules for making research software more robust

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

111 cited
  • 2023Is AI leading to a reproducibility crisis in science?106 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.