SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
MAPEAMENTO DO CONHECIMENTO EM REVISÕES DE ESCOPO: UM GUIA PARA PESQUISADORES E ACADÊMICOS DE ENFERMAGEM
16 references·0 citing·24 second hop
MAPEAMENTO DO CONHECIMENTO EM REVISÕES DE ESCOPO: UM GUIA PARA PESQUISADORES E ACADÊMICOS DE ENFERMAGEM (2024)MAPEAMENTO DO CONHECIMENTO EM REVISÕES DE…Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Recommendations for the extra…Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022)Best practice guidance and re…Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Updated methodological guidan…Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidan…JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)JBI Manual for Evidence Synth…Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Literature review as a resear…Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study (2019)Improving the content validit…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)Gray literature: An important…A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)A scoping review on the condu…Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting (2014)Scoping reviews: time for cla…A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data (2000)Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research (2002)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework (2013)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution (2023)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review (2020)The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? (2020)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour (2024)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation45,728 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework37,853 cited
  • 2019Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines16,035 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,768 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,859 cited
  • 2020Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews8,316 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,574 cited
  • 2020JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis4,343 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,124 cited
  • 2014Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting2,802 cited
  • 2016A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews2,310 cited
  • 2022Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews2,124 cited
  • 2022Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols1,561 cited
  • 2021Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews1,514 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2017
Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews
1,508 cited
  • 2019Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study1,202 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.