Characteristic of mental health app usage: a cross-sectional survey in the general population

Sophia Fürtjes · Elisabeth Gebel · Hanna Kische · Katja Beesdo‐Baum

8 citations0/0 files storedBMC Public Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Digital Mental Health Interventions Mental Health Treatment and Access Mobile Health and mHealth Applications

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mental health apps (MHA) have gained popularity in recent years. Most freely available apps are of low quality and lack evidence for effectiveness. Yet, download rates indicate high usage. MHA are potentially beneficial for individuals with no/low symptom severity as prevention, or as an option to reach underserviced populations. However, currently very little is known about the characteristics of MHA users in the general population, about the kind of MHA used, or the motivation behind MHA usage. METHODS: We collected survey-data from N = 1,247 individuals from the general population to investigate MHA usage. RESULTS: Descriptive statistics revealed that 41% had used MHA in the past 12 months; prescription app-use however was low (1.5% of MHA users). Mindfulness, moodtracking, and relaxation were the most popular categories of MHA. Perceived helpfulness, fun, and availability were the top reasons for MHA usage. Non-users reported distrust, lack of perceived need, and data security concerns as usage barriers. MHA users and non-users did not differ regarding sociodemographic variables. Multiple regression analyses revealed that sub-threshold symptoms of psychological disorders as well as higher levels of anxiety and stress were linked to higher probability of MHA usage. Higher levels of depression were associated with lower likelihood of MHA usage in general, but increased likelihood of usage of self-help apps specifically for depression. CONCLUSIONS: It follows that MHA use is common in the general population independent of sociodemographic characteristics. MHA can reach people who might benefit, but more awareness and better structure of the market is needed to reduce distrust, increase usage of high-quality MHA, and improve the fit between app and user.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

References

2011Item Banks for Measuring Emotional Distress From the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): Depression, Anxiety, and Anger 2005Young people’s help-seeking for mental health problems 2013Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys 2013Smartphones for Smarter Delivery of Mental Health Programs: A Systematic Review 2017The efficacy of smartphone‐based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials 2019Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis 2019The efficacy of app‐supported smartphone interventions for mental health problems: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials 2017Can smartphone mental health interventions reduce symptoms of anxiety? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Cited by

2025Efficacy of standalone smartphone apps for mental health: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis 2024Mental health apps within the healthcare system: associations with stigma and mental health literacy

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.