References

• 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
• 2010Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?404 cited
• 2013Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign272 cited
• 2014Publishing: The peer-review scam228 cited
• 2013The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science191 cited
• 2012Publish or perish: The myth and reality of academic publishing184 cited
• 2022Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study156 cited
• 2020European Science Editing148 cited
• 2007Causal Factors Implicated in Research Misconduct: Evidence from ORI Case Files144 cited
• 2018Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors140 cited
• 2014Plagiarism in research115 cited
• 2018Temporal characteristics of retracted articles107 cited
• 2012Perspective102 cited
• 2019Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology99 cited
• 2009Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)94 cited