Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Methodological quality assessment tools for diagnosis and prognosis research: overview and guidance

16 references·1 citing·35 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,711 cited
2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,549 cited
2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
2013Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors3,321 cited
2010To Explain or to Predict?3,127 cited
2018PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies3,114 cited
2015The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review2,082 cited
2018PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration1,694 cited
2020Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?1,686 cited
2006Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies612 cited
2021QUADAS-C: A Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies336 cited
2017A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools142 cited
2022QUAPAS: An Adaptation of the QUADAS-2 Tool to Assess Prognostic Accuracy Studies102 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2008

QUADOMICS: An adaptation of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) for the evaluation of the methodological quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of ‘-omics’-based technologies

101 cited

2005A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools79 cited

2021Large-scale validation of the prediction model risk of bias assessment Tool (PROBAST) using a short form: high risk of bias models show poorer discrimination65 cited

Cited by

2025PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods1,283 cited