SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Enhancing systematic literature review adapting ‘double diamond approach’
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Enhancing systematic literature review adapting ‘double diamond approach’ (2024)Enhancing systematic literature review ad…The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An…A methodological review of systematic literature reviews in higher education: Heterogeneity and homogeneity (2021)A methodological review of sy…Methodological Guidance Paper: The Art and Science of Quality Systematic Reviews (2020)Methodological Guidance Paper…Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them (2020)Eight problems with literatur…Still moving toward automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the third meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2019)Still moving toward automatio…Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Literature review as a resear…A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making (2019)A systematic review of algori…Sampling bias in climate–conflict research (2018)Sampling bias in climate–conf…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2016)Preferred reporting items for…Why Systematic Review rather than Narrative Review? (2015)Why Systematic Review rather …Toward More “Evidence‐Informed” Policy Making? (2015)Toward More “Evidence‐Informe…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews (2015)Making literature reviews mor…Systematic Reviews and Librarians (2006)Systematic Reviews and Librar…How Consumers and Policymakers Can Use Systematic Reviews for Decision Making (1997)How Consumers and Policymaker…"What is literature?" and other essays (1988)"What is literature?" and oth…Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Climate change and industrial F-gases: A critical and systematic review of developments, sociotechnical systems and policy options for reducing synthetic greenhouse gas emissions (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it (1990)Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health (2009)National Conference of State Legislatures (2011)Wicked tendencies in policy problems: rethinking the distinction between social and technical problems (2017)Understanding the Impacts of Research Synthesis (2018)The impact of sustainable tourism indicators on destination competitiveness: the European Tourism Indicator System (2021)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? (2020)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR) (2021)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. (2003)Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness (2008)Algorithmic management in a work context (2021)What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion (2021)Forecasting: theory and practice (2022)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Elements of a quality pre-service teacher mentor: A literature review (2020)Video Improves Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review (2021)Technology Use for Teacher Professional Development in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A systematic review (2022)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Can public awareness, knowledge and engagement improve climate change adaptation policies? (2021)The blended future of automation and AI: Examining some long-term societal and ethical impact features (2023)Sample Sizes for 10 Types of Qualitative Data Analysis: An Integrative Review, Empirical Guidance, and Next Steps (2024)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance (2021)The use of digital technology for social wellbeing reduces social isolation in older adults: A systematic review (2021)How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions (2023)Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette-Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2015)Perceptions of mental health and perceived barriers to mental health help-seeking amongst refugees: A systematic review (2019)Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts (2020)Persuasive writings, vigilant readings, and reconstructed characters: the paradox of trust in educational storysharing (1995)Race and reflexivity (2011)Shakespeare's History Plays (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2019Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines11,435 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews4,227 cited
  • 2019A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making809 cited
  • 2016Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation615 cited
  • 2020Methodological Guidance Paper: The Art and Science of Quality Systematic Reviews466 cited
  • 2015Toward More “Evidence‐Informed” Policy Making?457 cited
  • 2015Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews417 cited
  • 1988"What is literature?" and other essays336 cited
  • 2020Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them259 cited
  • 2018Sampling bias in climate–conflict research244 cited
  • 2015Why Systematic Review rather than Narrative Review?215 cited
  • 1997How Consumers and Policymakers Can Use Systematic Reviews for Decision Making196 cited
  • 2019Still moving toward automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the third meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

110 cited
  • 2006Systematic Reviews and Librarians84 cited
  • 2021A methodological review of systematic literature reviews in higher education: Heterogeneity and homogeneity65 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.