Critical policy studies in dialogue with multispecies perspectives: should it become a more-than-human endeavor?

Abstract

This forum contribution aims to start a conversation about how multispecies perspectives can broaden the scope of critical policy studies. By addressing three key questions – who speaks, whom do we speak for, and how do we speak for those who are silenced – it examines the power dynamics, ethical considerations, and representational challenges in advocating for nonhuman entities in governance. I discuss frameworks that recognize the rights and agency of nonhuman entities, such as animals, ecosystems, and rivers, with a particular focus on epistemic justice and the inclusion of Indigenous cosmologies that acknowledge the interconnectedness of humans and nonhumans. I also consider the methodological and ethical challenges, including issues of power, representation and informed consent, and explore alternative approaches such as multispecies ethnography to better include nonhuman perspectives. I conclude with three key strategies that can broaden the scope of critical policy studies: making visible silences concerning nonhuman entities in policy; rethinking representation of nonhuman entities in policy; and overcoming silences in representation by adopting reflexive, inclusive methodologies that account for nonhuman interests in policy.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.