SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality assessment tool for theory-based and literature review studies (QATTL): development and validation of a critical appraisal tool
16 references·0 citing·53 second hop
Quality assessment tool for theory-based and literature review studies (QATTL): development and validation of a critical appraisal tool (2024)Quality assessment tool for theory-based …Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies (2021)Quality assessment with diver…The Why and How of the Integrative Review (2020)The Why and How of the Integr…Best-Practice Recommendations for Producers, Evaluators, and Users of Methodological Literature Reviews (2020)Best-Practice Recommendations…The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers (2018)The Mixed Methods Appraisal T…Appraising Qualitative Research for Evidence Syntheses: A Compendium of Quality Appraisal Tools (2018)Appraising Qualitative Resear…The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)The methodological quality as…Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)Critical Appraisal and Data E…Making sense of Cronbach's alpha (2011)Making sense of Cronbach's al…From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence-Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance (2010)From Systematic Reviews to Cl…A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed (2010)A review of critical appraisa…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Using thematic analysis in ps…A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools (2004)A systematic review of the co…Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)Cutoff criteria for fit index…A Review of Inference Procedures for the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient in the One-Way Random Effects Model (1986)A Review of Inference Procedu…The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability (1973)The Equivalence of Weighted K…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Effects of music interventions on stress-related outcomes: a systematic review and two meta-analyses (2019)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Anxiety, depression, trauma-related, and sleep disorders among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place (2015)Thematic Analysis (2017)Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis (2019)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Scale Development : Theory and Applications (1991)What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. (1993)Enhancing Student Engagement Using the Flipped Classroom (2014)Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches (2015)Development and initial validation of the COVID Stress Scales (2020)Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. (1980)Comparative fit indexes in structural models. (1990)Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit (1992)Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. (1998)Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures (2003)Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement (2015)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluation (1991)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review. (1999)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Communities of practice learning, meaning, and identity (1999)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Guidelines for Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development (2024)Sample Sizes for 10 Types of Qualitative Data Analysis: An Integrative Review, Empirical Guidance, and Next Steps (2024)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme (2006)Where Do Models for Change Management, Improvement and Implementation Meet? A Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare (2021)Prevalence & Correlates of Intimate Partner Violence During COVID-19: A Rapid Review (2022)Development and socialization of self-regulation from infancy to adolescence: A meta-review differentiating between self-regulatory abilities, goals, and motivation (2023)Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review (2020)A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Using thematic analysis in psychology193,725 cited
  • 1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives108,592 cited
  • 2011Making sense of Cronbach's alpha15,098 cited
  • 2018The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers4,688 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 1973The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability3,355 cited
  • 2015The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review2,079 cited
  • 2014Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist2,012 cited
  • 2020The Why and How of the Integrative Review690 cited
  • 2021Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies488 cited
  • 2004A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools390 cited
  • 2018Appraising Qualitative Research for Evidence Syntheses: A Compendium of Quality Appraisal Tools301 cited
  • 1986A Review of Inference Procedures for the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient in the One-Way Random Effects Model

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

291 cited
  • 2010A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed261 cited
  • 2020Best-Practice Recommendations for Producers, Evaluators, and Users of Methodological Literature Reviews221 cited
  • 2010From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence-Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance184 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.