SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
No reward without responsibility: Focus on peer review reports
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
No reward without responsibility: Focus on peer review reports (2024)No reward without responsibility: Focus o…Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Fighting reviewer fatigue or …Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers? (2022)Should peer reviewers be paid…Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills (2021)Retractions, Fake Peer Review…A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review (2021)A billion-dollar donation: es…What does better peer review look like? Underlying principles and recommendations for better practice (2019)What does better peer review …The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals (2019)The effect of publishing peer…Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…Is Peer Review a Good Idea? (2019)Is Peer Review a Good Idea?What is a predatory journal? A scoping review (2018)What is a predatory journal? …What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing's ‘death penalty' (2018)What a massive database of re…What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…Peer review and the publication process (2016)Peer review and the publicati…Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors (2015)Ensuring the Quality, Fairnes…Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review (2014)Problems with Traditional Sci…Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewScience, Truth, and Democracy (2002)Science, Truth, and DemocracyScience as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (1994)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM (2019)Making Black Lives Matter in academia: A Black feminist call for collective action against anti‐blackness in the academy (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Social Media Scholarship and Alternative Metrics for Academic Promotion and Tenure (2017)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought (2013)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions (2021)Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals (2021)Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals (2021)Science Since Babylon (1961)Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education (2022)Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks (2019)Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey (2019)Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review (2020)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions (2023)The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts (2023)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)Why do nations produce science advances and new technology? (2019)Perspectival Realism (2022)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review453 cited
  • 2002Science, Truth, and Democracy379 cited
  • 2021A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review305 cited
  • 2019The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals276 cited
  • 2023Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review268 cited
  • 2015Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors161 cited
  • 2014Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review158 cited
  • 2018What is a predatory journal? A scoping review156 cited
  • 2018What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing's ‘death penalty'144 cited
  • 2019Is Peer Review a Good Idea?137 cited
  • 2016Peer review and the publication process125 cited
  • 2021Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills80 cited
  • 2022Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

71 cited
  • 2019What does better peer review look like? Underlying principles and recommendations for better practice56 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.