SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleUse of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals

Zhiqiang Li2024

OA

Articlegold2024

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals

Zhiqiang Li · Huilin Xu · Huijuan Cao · Zhao-Lan Liu · Yutong Fei

78 citations·0/0 files stored·JAMA Network Open

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

This cross-sectional study of 100 top medical journals examines policies for use of artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI in peer review.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 78 citations exist upstream.

References

2023Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review 2024Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis 2024Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis 2023Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots

Cited by

2025Defining the Boundaries of AI Use in Scientific Writing: A Comparative Review of Editorial Policies 2025AI is transforming peer review — and many scientists are worried 2025When and how to disclose AI use in academic publishing: AMEE Guide No.192 2025Peer Review in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Call for Developing Responsible Integration Guidelines 2025Ensuring peer review integrity in the era of large language models: A critical stocktaking of challenges, red flags, and recommendations 2025A Cross‐Disciplinary Analysis of AI Policies in Academic Peer Review 2025Personal experience with AI-generated peer reviews: a case study 2025

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2024Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?article · 3 shared references 2024The transformative impact of large language models on medical writing and publishing: current applications, challenges and future directionsreview · 3 shared references 2025Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A surveyarticle · 3 shared references 2025Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review: Insights from Journal Reviewersarticle · 2 shared references 2024Generative artificial intelligence and scientific publishing: urgent questions, difficult answersarticle · 2 shared references 2023Affiliation Bias in Peer Review of Abstracts by a Large Language Modelarticle · 2 shared references

Details

Year2024

Typearticle

Published2024-12-03

VenueJAMA Network Open

ISSN-L2574-3805

Languageen

Citations78

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Identifiers

doi10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48609

openalex_workW4404963546

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

Large language models in peer review: challenges and opportunities