SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Use and application of geographical restrictions in systematic reviews with the aim of including studies about Germany: An update of a methodological review
16 references·0 citing·42 second hop
Use and application of geographical restrictions in systematic reviews with the aim of including studies about Germany: An update of a methodological review (2024)Use and application of geographical restr…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019 (2021)Nearly 80 systematic reviews …A Systematic Review of Factors Affecting Mental Health and Well-Being of Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Germany (2021)A Systematic Review of Factor…JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)JBI Manual for Evidence Synth…A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)A tutorial on methodological …Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks (2019)Definition of a systematic re…Inequalities in health care utilization among migrants and non-migrants in Germany: a systematic review (2018)Inequalities in health care u…A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018)A systematic approach to sear…Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Guidelines for reporting meta…When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist (2016)When and how to update system…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…The Systematic Review (2014)The Systematic ReviewEpidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency (2006)Errors in search strategies w…Evaluation of methodological search filters—a review (2004)Evaluation of methodological …Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Qualitative research synthesis (2015)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect (2017)Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale: A meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions (2019)Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study (2020)Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study (2017)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0 (2024)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement (2022)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews: a scoping review protocol (2025)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews27,008 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,744 cited
  • 2020JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis4,343 cited
  • 2018A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches917 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2014The Systematic Review606 cited
  • 2017Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research516 cited
  • 2016When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist424 cited
  • 2021Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019285 cited
  • 2019Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks259 cited
  • 2004Evaluation of methodological search filters—a review208 cited
  • 2018Inequalities in health care utilization among migrants and non-migrants in Germany: a systematic review191 cited
  • 2020A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why181 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2021A Systematic Review of Factors Affecting Mental Health and Well-Being of Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Germany170 cited
  • 2006Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency142 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.