Systematization of peer review in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde

Marcus Tolentino Silva · Taís Freire Galvão

5 citations0/0 files storedEpidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Abstract

Peer review is one of the pillars of quality and credibility in scientific.Despite its relevance, the process is imperfect and affected by variability in quality and delays.The process of peer review requires constant management of biases and inconsistencies.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles 2017Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective 2006Is Peer Review a Game of Chance?2002How to Survive Peer Review 2018Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency 2019Generosity, collegiality, and scientific accuracy when writing and reviewing original research 2018Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache 2013Peer Review Guidance: How Do You Write a Good Review?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.