Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT‐4o in Risk of Bias Assessments

10 references·3 citing·31 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
2011GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)2,798 cited
2016New evidence pyramid1,382 cited
2020The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application470 cited
2023Risk-of-bias assessment using Cochrane's revised tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was useful but challenging and resource-intensive: observations from a systematic review177 cited
2024Integrating large language models in systematic reviews: a framework and case study using ROBINS-I for risk of bias assessment72 cited
2020Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews52 cited
2022Adherence of systematic reviews to Cochrane RoB2 guidance was frequently poor: a meta epidemiological study37 cited
2024Pilot study on large language models for risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews: A(I) new type of bias?19 cited

Cited by

2025Large Language Models and the Analyses of Adherence to Reporting Guidelines in Systematic Reviews and Overviews of Reviews (PRISMA 2020 and PRIOR)13 cited
2025Human Versus Artificial Intelligence: Comparing Cochrane Authors' and ChatGPT's Risk of Bias Assessments12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2025

ChatGPT-4o in Risk-of-Bias Assessments in Neonatology: A Validity Analysis

11 cited